View Single Post
Old 23-09-2009, 01:13 AM   #5
inside_united
academy
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 250
Thanks: 10
Thanked 117 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
inside_united Ready for being a real United Indonesia


Default Re: We Always Got Extra Time When We Need It

TS-nya Daniel Taylor yang nyamar ya?
Quote:

Revealed: Manchester United get more injury time when they need it

• Guardian study shows added time to turn round home games
• Owen won derby after an extra five minutes and 26 seconds

Daniel Taylor
The Guardian, Tuesday 22 September 2009


Sir Alex Ferguson likes to boast that his Manchester United team score more late goals than any other side in the world. Others argue that they get a bit of extra help from referees. It has now emerged that the Premier League champions do, as suspected, benefit from an imbalance in the amount of stoppage time that is added to their matches.

After the controversy over Michael Owen's winning goal in Sunday's Manchester derby, the Guardian has looked at all of United's league matches at Old Trafford since the start of the 2006-07 season and discovered that, on average, there has been over a minute extra added by referees when United do not have the lead after 90 minutes, compared to when they are in front. In 48 games when United were ahead, the average amount of stoppage time was 191.35 seconds. In 12 matches when United were drawing or losing there was an average of 257.17sec.

The average stoppage time added at Old Trafford in the period in question is below that given at Anfield, the Emirates Stadium and Stamford Bridge. United's is 205 seconds, compared to Liverpool's 210sec, Arsenal's 224sec and Chelsea's 229sec. But there is also evidence to support the suspicions of many managers, players and supporters that United get preferential treatment at home. When Owen made it 4-3 on Sunday the game was five minutes and 26 seconds into stoppage time. In total, the referee, Martin Atkinson, allowed almost seven minutes, even though the fourth official had signalled a minimum of four. Mark Hughes, the City manager, spoke of feeling "robbed". His sense of grievance will not be helped if he analyses the last three seasons.

In 2006-07, for example, United were winning 15 times on entering stoppage time and referees added an average 194.53sec. In the four games when United were not winning there was an average of 217.25sec. The following year the disparity was greater, Opta's figures showing an average 178.29sec added when United were winning and 254.5sec when they were not. Last season it was 187.71sec compared to 258.6sec.

The pattern has continued in the first three games of the season. In the two games United have led they have played an average 304sec of injury time. On Sunday, Atkinson allowed the game to go on for 415sec
kaya terjemahan aja...

Lagian udah dicounter ama Graham Poll, tapi ya ini emang wasit agak gila juga sih [masih terngiang-ngiang tiga kartu kuning buat pemain Kroasia], jadi ya terserah mau percaya yang mana.

Quote:
GRAHAM POLL: Well done ref, you timed the Manchester derby just right - and United showed how City to play to the whistle
By Graham Poll Last updated at 9:42 AM on 22nd September 2009


Having watched a complete re-run of Sunday's Manchester derby, I have to conclude that Martin Atkinson was absolutely correct and highly credible in his time-keeping.

Mystery and controversy often surround the amount of additional time allowed, but this is covered in law seven, 'The duration of a match'.

It is wonderfully ambiguous in listing the reasons why allowance for time lost should be made.

There are five listed: substitutions; assessment of injury to players; removal of injured players from the field of play for treatment; wasting time: and any other cause.

The final point makes it easy to understand the lack of clarity when a law relies on so much subjectivity.

There is no need to add time on whenever the ball goes out of play for throw-ins, goal kicks or free-kicks, as they are viewed as natural stoppages.

Referees tend to follow guidelines, which are that for every goal or substitution you should allow 30 seconds and then add a minute or two for injuries and/or time-wasting, if they have occurred.

When there is a lengthy delay for a serious injury, it is often timed and added to the calculated time.

There were three goals and three substitutions in the second half at Old Trafford, which means that a minimum of three minutes had to be added, plus a minute due to other causes, hence the four minutes which were indicated.

Then, in stoppage time, there was another goal and a substitution, meaning that at least one more minute had to be added, with a fan running on to the pitch taking up further seconds.

So, well done Martin Atkinson for attention to detail and to Manchester United for playing right to the final whistle.
Yang jelas kalo buat gue, alasan perpanjangan waktu yang panjang itu kurang memiliki dasar karena toh yang maen kan dua tim, City juga punya kesempatan bikin gol kan?
Sama juga kaya argumen Wenger dulu2 kalo lapangan bermainnya jelek, padahal yang maen di atas lapangan kan dua tim kenapa mesti Arsenal doang yang ngeluh.

Last edited by dree_united; 25-09-2009 at 03:26 PM.. Reason: tambahin quote di artikelnya
inside_united is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to inside_united For This Useful Post: