United Indonesia - Manchester United Indonesia Supporters Club

United Indonesia - Manchester United Indonesia Supporters Club (http://www.unitedindonesia.org/forum/index.php)
-   United News (http://www.unitedindonesia.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors (http://www.unitedindonesia.org/forum/showthread.php?t=577)

Redsbusby 21-05-2012 06:57 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Nih gw tambahin daftar Brand Termahal di dunia sepakbola tahun ini versi The Brand Finance Football. yang gw harap cuma 1 : predikat keuangan sejalan dengan kebijakan transfer :p

1. Manchester United - USD $853 millions
2. Bayern Munich - USD $786 millions
3. Real Madrid - USD $600 millions
4. Barcelona - USD $580 millions
5. Chelsea - USD $398 millions
6. Arsenal - USD $388 millions
7. Liverpool - USD $367 millions
8. Manchester City - USD $302 millions
9. AC Milan - USD $292 millions
10. Schalke 04 - USD $266 millions

Redsbusby 22-05-2012 07:39 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Laporan keuangan United dibandingin dengan tahun lalu...

http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...34822005_n.jpg

fredrian.seven 31-05-2012 11:23 AM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Ekspansi terus buat nutupi rugi karena nihil gelar...

_____________________

United to announce deal with Chevrolet as Old Trafford club seek Far East expansion
dailymail.co.uk

Manchester United are set for a commercial tie-up with General Motors which is to be announced in the Chinese city of Shanghai on Thursday.

The deal will concern the GM brand Chevrolet and the 19-time English champions, with details to be disclosed at a press conference taking place at midday UK time.

United have a strong market presence as a club in the Far East, with research conducted on behalf of the club showing they have twice as many supporters in the region as Barcelona, their nearest rivals.

The same research, published on Wednesday, also claimed that almost 10 per cent of the world's entire population support Sir Alex Ferguson's team.

The club's commercial director, Richard Arnold, said such global levels of support had helped United's commercial income soar.

Arnold said: 'Our family of followers has doubled in five years and across the world this represents a very, very important asset and relationship for the club.'

DeE_ 31-05-2012 06:41 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
nambahin berita chevrolet
http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...25426279_n.jpg

Chevrolet has agreed a five-year partnership to become Manchester United’s official automotive partner.

The U.S.-based car manufacturer has pledged that fans will be at the heart of the sponsorship, with a constant focus on bringing the club's supporters and football fans around the world closer to the game than ever before.

United’s chief executive David Gill said: "Although part of two very di...fferent industries, Chevrolet and Manchester United share many of the same values.

"Like the club, it is steeped in history, having recently celebrated its centenary, and it has also grown to be a global brand, selling cars in more than 140 countries.

"Above all, it, too, strives to be the best in its field and I am delighted to welcome Chevrolet as our official automotive partner."

Andi Istiabudi 01-06-2012 04:55 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
@moris33 :
Kang, saya sarankan mulai saat ini pengurus pusat UI coba dekati pihak Chevrolet Indonesia agar kedepannya jika ada event yang berkaitan dengan kedatangan pemain / mantan pemain United ke Indonesia, UI bisa menjadi mitra atau dilibatkan dalam acaranya. Sekedar masukan saja sih :)

fredrian.seven 13-06-2012 08:17 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
EQUITIES: Manchester United drops Asian IPO for US listing
13 June 2012 | By Daniel Stanton, Fiona Lau - ifre.com

Just as Manchester United Football Club saw the English Premier League title slip away in the dying minutes of last season, Singapore has now lost the club’s US$1bn trophy listing to another jurisdiction.

Manchester United has ditched its plans for an Asian listing and is preparing to list in the US, according to sources with knowledge of the deal. After first eyeing a Hong Kong IPO, it had planned to float shares in Singapore in the second half of last year.

As a result of its change of listing location, Manchester United is expected to make changes to its bookrunning syndicate. Credit Suisse, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley were originally mandated as bookrunners for the Singapore listing, but sources said that this line-up might change. Jefferies has also joined the deal, sources said.

The banks on the deal and a Manchester United spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

One of the sources said Manchester United had always planned to position itself as a global media business rather than a sports franchise, suggesting that a US listing would make more sense.

The club’s American owners, the Glazer family, are well known in the US as owners of American football team the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, as well as First Allied Corp, which owns and leases shopping centres. Conversely, they are extremely unpopular in the UK, which could have made a London listing difficult.

Fewer fans

US investors are also familiar with the dual-class share structure that was under discussion for Manchester United’s Singapore listing, having seen it used by household names such as Google and Facebook. The Glazers are understood to have wanted to sell Class B shares with limited or no voting rights to maintain a level of control of 95%–100%. That structure was said to be one reason why they opted for Singapore in the first place, as, unlike Hong Kong, the exchange was happy to agree to the format, and for the club’s Class A shares to be quoted but not traded.

However, the issuer is understood to have become frustrated with long delays in approval from the SGX, even after it had indicated it would have no problems with a dual-class share issue.

A US listing might earn the company a better valuation as a media business, since it has contracts for broadcasting rights as well as its own television channel. However, it is unlikely to achieve the original goal of putting shares in the hands of a wide base of United fans. A source said the original aim of the Singapore listing was to create “a pan-regional platform for retail investors”.

Singapore had seemed the ideal location, as it provided a way to reach retail investors in one of its biggest fan bases, Indonesia. When the Singapore listing was still under consideration, the importance of Asia to the company, with much of its growth coming from Asian merchandise sales, had been heavily emphasised during marketing to investors.

The club claims to have 659m supporters worldwide, of which 325m are in Asia Pacific and 55m in Indonesia. It counts just 34m fans in North America, where football has yet to build a significant supporter base.

_______________________________________

Fans United di Indonesia > fans United di amerika utara? :-O

ollacarla 14-06-2012 07:34 PM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Glazer may move Manchester United stock sale to U.S.


After a spate of initial public offerings were postponed or canceled across Asia, the popular British Premier League soccer club Manchester United may hold its IPO in the United States instead of Singapore, according to a report by the New York Times.

Manchester United Owner Malcolm Glazer also owns the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Glazer had hoped to raise $1 billion in the Singapore IPO, according to the Times.

Unnamed sources told the Times of the possible IPO location switch. The club's bookrunner team includes Credit Suisse, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, but that team is subject to change.

Last year, Manchester United reported $462 million in revenue, according to the consulting firm Deloitte. The soccer club still bears $685 million in debt related to Glazer's 2005 buyout of the team, reported the Times.

http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/...er-united.html

zudomiriku 15-06-2012 02:21 PM

Man Utd Move Their Share Issue to the US
 
Manchester United Move Their Share Issue to the US

http://i682.photobucket.com/albums/v...crop_exact.jpg

For all those anti-Glazer supporters who predict doom and gloom, it's time to hide behind the sofa again.

The planned Singapore flotation has been moved to the US.

Despite the period of almost unmatched success since the takeover and the massive commercial contract wins that dwarf their global rivals, there are some so-called "fans" who continue to bash the club and manager because of their American ownership.

Today, however, newswires are carrying the story that the parent company is moving its float to the US—presumably NASDAQ:

Originally, it had been hoped that a float in Singapore would bring a wide shareholders group of enthusiastic fans, including Indonesia and China, as well as fresh capital to the company.

That original IPO was expected to generate funds not only to pay off the outstanding debt, but also to create a transfer and development pool that could be enhanced every year by generated profits.

There is no reason why the same result cannot be achieved in the US, although shares are more likely to be bought by professional and savvy investors than fans.

However, if United's latest commercial partnership with General Motors is anything to go by, the issue may also tap into a wider audience of goodwill not only in the US, but also from overseas investors attracted by a sports/major brand/dollar denominated investment.

Shock horror. GM have ditched sponsorship of the Super Bowl in preference for United. City could never achieve that...

Laying the "United Have No Cash" Bogey

I have been utterly fed up by the avalanche of articles and comments constantly stating with authority that United have no cash to spend.

The latest justification for this prognostication has been that the Glazers have sucked £500m out of the club through debt and interest payments. Yes, such payments have been made, and yes, the Glazers as owners have benefited from what thousands of companies do all over the world when taken over by private capital.

So then the protesters claim that the fans are suffering as a result. Well, ticket prices have been frozen for next season and are still well below those of other top Premier League teams.

Meanwhile, nobody ever mentions the massive increase in commercial revenue over the last five years.

And no, I'm not a Glazer apologist; I'm an unpaid freelance journalist reveling in the principle of free speech.

Those who say the Glazers have prevented Sir Alex from spending money in the transfer market cite the debt repayments a a justification.

First, 11 million people in the UK have borrowed several multiples of their income by way of mortgage; others think nothing of borrowing to buy cars or stack their credit cards, but somehow think it is obscene for the parent company of United to owe money.

Sir Alex has chosen not to spend money, and with debt interest at nine percent-plus, it is a no-brainer to use it to repay rather than leave it in the bank at one quarter of one percent.

But to state categorically that the Glazers are preventing spending is to make Sir Alex out to be a liar and a Glazer apologist, as he has stated categorically for at least a couple of years that he will only spend money where he thinks there is value.

One recent article even suggested that United would not be able to afford to buy Kagawa! Well, my friend, they did, and they bought Powell and Henriquez and they haven't finished yet.

And do you seriously think Sir Alex has to go with the begging bowl to the Glazers? No. David Gill and Sir Alex run this particular ship and, unless they make a dreadful mistake, will continue to do so.

So then people somehow imply the Glazers have caused United to finish behind City.

Sorry, but I frankly think Sheikh Mansour's spending is indefensibly obscene in a world where millions of people on his continent are dying of starvation.

By inflating salaries alone, he is rewarding some of his players with more in a day than most Britons earn in a year.

And no, there is no politics of envy going on here. Someone has to make a stand to stop this wrong set of values and obscenity in spending to create relatively little economic value. Why aren't protesters marching against Mansour, Abramovich and highly-paid footballers who demand £100,000 a week net, rather than bankers?

Yes, United pay inflated salaries just to stay in the game, but they aren't losing money like most of the clubs in English football and, having offered Nasri £135,000 a week, refused to match City's £40,000 extra.

A New Dawn

Manchester United came second with the most points ever despite nine times the number of injury days of City. Sir Alex is doing a great job.

When the US IPO goes ahead, United will have no debt, and whoever is manager will have a steady flow of transfer funds annually to compete with anyone.

Of course, it will be a success, because United have not only the most valuable football, or even sports, brands in the world, it is one of the most visible of all brands in the world.

With 659 million fans worldwide and more than 10 times as many followers of City on Facebook, together with burgeoning commercial revenues and the biggest companies in the world clamouring to be associated, we can look forward to an exciting, stable and successful future.

Code:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1220713-manchester-united-move-their-share-issue-to-the-us?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=world-football

ollacarla 17-06-2012 12:25 AM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Banks And Glazer Family Battle Over Value Of Manchester United


Given all economic turmoil across the globe the Glazer family may be seeking too rich a valuation for Manchester United even though the soccer club the most well-known sports team in the world.

The Financial Times is reporting there is a big disagreement between the Glazer family and bankers over how much England’s Manchester Unitedis worth. According to the report the Glazer family, which owns the soccer club, believes the Red Devils are worth over 2 billion pounds (roughly $3 billion) but according to the FT Morgan Stanley will not participate in Manchester United’s public offering because the investment bank believes the Glazer family’s valuation is too high. Jefferies is replacing Morgan Stanley.

In April Forbes valued Manchester United at $2.24 billion, more than any other sports team. Recently I wrote how the English Premier League’s new domestic television deal and the big increase in the rights fee for its next international deal will give Manchester United’s public offering a lift. But based on the FT’s article an $800 million boost, to $3 billion, is too rich.

The Glazer family, which has a net worth of $2.7 billion, also owns the Tampa Bay Buccaneers of the National Football League.

fredrian.seven 24-07-2012 08:40 AM

Re: Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors
 
Glazers accelerate New York Stock Exchange flotation plans 'to avoid fans' fury'
23 July 2012 - dailymail

Manchester United have shifted forward plans to float on the New York Stock Exchange and could be listed as early as next week in an attempt to raise £64million to help reduce the club's huge debts.

The club will sell shares to Wall Street investors but the flotation would leave the Glazer family in charge: the billionaire investors bought the club in 2005 for £940million taking on debt of £423million.
United - valued by Forbes magazine at £1.43billion, making it the most valuable club in world football.

Documents were filed with the US government's Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, thereby making public the planned Initial Public Offering (IPO)

The club aborted a move to float on the Singapore Stock Exchange last year and will now move to become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Manchester United Ltd, a holding company based in the Cayman Islands.

Duncan Drasdo, chief executive of the Manchester United Supporters’ Trust, told Manchester Evening News: 'We are surprised that the timetable has been accelerated and can only assume it is due to the absolute panning their proposals have taken in the financial press and they want to get the IPO away as quickly as possible now and certainly before the start of the season for fear of bad PR regarding fans’ reactions.

'The terms the Glazers are coming forward with are hugely disappointing. It's a massive missed opportunity simply so they can cling to power while inviting others to pay their debt.'

He added: 'Not only is this a high risk investment, especially for minority shareholders at the mercy of the Glazers who will be looking after their own interests first and foremost.

'Worse still they’ve already declared the shares will pay no dividends.'

___________________

Video youtube tentang IPO United, dapet dari redcafe



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
United Indonesia - Manchester United Supporters Club of Indonesia